Measuring “difficulty” in a session
If strongman has taught me anything, it’s that training for strongman can be a major pain in the butt. Aka it’s a hassle or difficult.
This difficulty comes from more than just load on the implement but logistical factors around set up, access of equipment, need for spotters, or even weather.
To work around this, I loosely filter my decision making through the lens of the athlete and rank movements on a “Goldilocks” scale of 1 to 3. (And just like a pain score, it’s relative to the athlete).
This plays in with programming to reduce unnecessary difficulty.
So if I have an athlete who needs to wrap knees, get spotters, and hit a heavy top set (a 3 for most) that might not be the session to also drag out stones and get messy with tacky (also a 3). Or to start off with sandbag toss with ascending weights when they only have one bag when drills or sub-maximal drills/work could be done with one bag (a 2-3 reduced to 1-2).
This filters down to accessory work. An accessory that needs more warm up sets and acclimation to movement pattern is going to rank higher than a bodyweight movement they can just go after (think pull ups vs barbell rows for simplicity).
For everything that gets more complex, something else has to get more simple. French contrast at start of session? Straight hypertrophy sets at end. Multi-part strongman medley mid-session? Simple stability or machine biased accessories.
Hassle or difficulty is a stressor just as much as loading, time under tension, or proximity to failure. And like stress, each athlete has a unique tolerance.
Count the “difficulty” or hassle score session to session and see if some days you are just asking for too much.
🚨𝐃𝐌 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐂𝐨𝐚𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠
Private In-Person Sessions Available
@firstcalledstrength