‘In the weeks before the
@snluk premiere, the misgivings of onlookers curdled into open hostility. When Humphrey Ker, one of the show’s writers, appeared on Chris Moyles’s Radio X programme, Moyles dispensed with any pretence of neutrality. “Is it going to be funny?” he demanded, adding, with some relish, that the programme had already been widely slated. “We’re aware there’s an awful lot of weight of expectation,” Ker replied, graciously. Graham Norton, who appeared in the first UK episode alongside its American host Tina Fey, later admitted on his podcast that he, too, had doubts. “I was there and I was knocking it,” he said. “I was thinking: ‘This is going to be so bad.’”
It wasn’t. In the opening monologue to the first show, Fey offered viewers a brisk tour of the British comedy canon, signalling both her own fluency and the format’s appreciation of the national inheritance into which it was intruding. She confronted the scorned premise directly: why even start a new SNL? “Like so many large-scale American operations these days,” she joked, “no one really knows.” Almost immediately viewers witnessed the force of the show’s young ensemble: Jack Shep’s unhinged portrayal of Princess Diana, Sidi’s range and comic precision, George Fouracres’s twinkling absurdity. The reviews, when they came, reinforced the feeling of wary surprise. The Daily Telegraph described the episode as “shockingly competent”. The Independent noticed a “huge groundswell of support” from viewers who had previously written it off. Even the New York Times drew favourable comparisons with the American original, citing a “promising debut” with “as many, if not more, funny premises than in a typical episode”.’
For
@obsmagazine I spent time with SNL UK’s cast and crew (with an unexpected cameo from JJ Abrams?!) to find out how the show defied its legions of naysayers.