18 days ago
Friendship breakups are never easy, but few are as messy and expensive as the collapse of Elon Musk and Sam Altman’s once thriving tech bromance.
On Thursday, closing arguments wrapped up in Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAI, leaving a jury to deliberate next week whether Altman and other executives “stole a charity” (as one of Musk’s lawyers put it) by turning much of what was once a nonprofit research lab into a corporate behemoth.
For three weeks, lawyers on both sides have deployed an increasingly unhinged body of evidence in an attempt to discredit both men and prove they’re untrustworthy and power-hungry.
If the jury rules that Musk was duped into donating roughly $38 million to OpenAI under false pretenses, then Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers will decide on the damages, which could potentially lead to $150 billion in financial restitution and, while unlikely, could also include major changes to OpenAI’s leadership and governance structure.
Even if the jury does not rule in Musk’s favor, however, it’s possible that the evidence put forth at trial will be enough to convince state regulators to revisit the agreements that allowed OpenAI to restructure into a for-profit enterprise to begin with.
Read more at the link in our bio.
📸: Benjamin Fanjoy/Getty Images
1,583
11
Hey geniuses opening ai was supposed to be open to everyone and not for profit geniuses
18 days ago
18 days ago
All of these things were revealed by Ronan Farrow’s New Yorker story - literally months before the trial.
18 days ago
Imagine a mob community house hiding ridiculed elect.
17 days ago
One and only revelation : GREED
17 days ago
Shut em both down. Period. 🔥🔥🔥🔥
17 days ago
If all these guys snapped out of existence, the world and society would be a better place.
17 days ago
If the board member know how Sam Altman becomes the man he is today… they wouldn’t be questioning… clearly they did not do their side of research
16 days ago